![]() ![]() ![]() The tanks also have a tendency to move forward beyond the first line, thus taking more damage from the grenades. Haven't gone heavy with the grenadiers, but if you are up against a lot of strong single target damage the grenadiers may not work well. Three might work well too on maps/bases were they will spread out more.įor damage I add tanks/zookas/grenadiers go to behind them. I only have two landing craft up to 21, but I'd use these in at least pairs. Or just more scorchers.Įdit: Skipping around this video with 6scorcher no medic, seems to wreck everything just fine without losing a couple medics each attack. I'd think you'd be better off with something else offensive and killing faster. Tldr It would seem to me as though medic healing is a drop in a bucket for even the lowliest of Scorchers. Its not like they're saving a tank from the brink of death or keeping a big pack of riflemen up. Just skipping around the first video I found of the combo, it looks like the medics are just scurrying around doing a lot of nothing. The scorcher is only medium range and seems to act very erraticly, so chances seem relatively high that your medics will start taking some fire from angles, walk over mines, etc. the medics are relatively static in their healing at +1/level. Scorchers are only going to get more health as you boost statues or upgrade the unit. Four medics at 24/sec would be ~100/sec, or 1/325 of the health bar a second. Lets say +30% TH with level 1 scorcher, so 32500 health. You've got a static 20-30 healing/s per medic, and a scorcher at level 1 has 25k health before statue bonuses. Such combination is the best for the attack when enemy’s defense has two Doom Cannons.I'm only HQ17, but from what I've seen, medics would be kind of silly with a scorcher. Don’t know why… As they say every man to his own taste. I’ve used this very effectively a few times… But for some reasons I don’t like it. ![]() And It’s takes an extra time (or diamonds) to compensate losses. One huge minus of such variant of attack is permanent losses of Zookas almost in every attack (due to low health of unit). I use such combination less often despite the fact that offensive power of such combination is stronger than in case with Tanks. The weaknesses of such combination: totally unsuitable in case when enemy’s defense has two Doom Cannons (such prototype weapon destroy Tank from one shot) high energy consumption for landing ashore. Probably the most popular combination with Scorcher in the Boom Beach. The most popular combinations with Scorcher are next: In my opinion, there are no other disadvantages in such variant of attack (maybe except of case when two Doom Cannons installed on enemy’s island). The only drawback of such variant of attack is the huge energy consumption for landing Scorchers ashore (96 units of energy or 12 per one Scorcher). But they have something to strive □įor attacks in Boom Beach, players can use only Scorchers without any other units. Scorcher is available from the 16th level of Headquarters and players who haven’t reached that level unfortunately can’t assess the merits of this unit. But it’s not very big problem!Īll power of Scorchers shown on video below:Ĭool, yeah? It’s a pity is not always in the presence enough amount of Power Powder … With such huge amount of spending energy it’s impossible to use only Scorchers without Statue which increases Gunboat energy. The only one minus is requirement of too much energy for landing of one Scorcher ashore (12 units). 8 level and this is 43,000 of health and 975 damage per second! Impressive, isn’t it? And if they are under influence of Statues and Power Powder… Such Scorchers are unstoppable! The every unit is trapped by fire – invasion of Scorchers – don’t give up and fight!Īs You might have guessed this post is focused on my favorite unit in the Game – Scorcher! In my humble opinion nowadays the Scorcher is the most powerful unit in the Boom Beach. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() These two books provide additional rules and objectives which are unique to each of the 25 different haunts. ![]() Then the player who takes on the role of the monster uses the Monster’s Tome while the rest of the players read the Secrets of Survival. They are used once the haunt has been revealed. In addition to the rulebook, the game also includes two other manuals.
![]() ![]() And this in part is down to its very streamlined interface. I have to admit here that Rekordbox is by far the easiest of the two to use. Sure, if you only use Rekordbox with Pioneer brand controllers you get excellent reliability, there’s no question about that.īut when used with other controllers, the reliability of Rekordbox matches that of Traktor.īut of course, the main thing to affect reliability is your computer and how powered and dependable it is. To be perfectly honest there’s not a whole lot of difference between the stability of the two platforms… ![]() ![]() You simply set the criteria that you want your songs to meet, and the software will pull together a list of all the songs that meet that criteria. Sure Traktor offers key detection which makes mixing easier, but Rekordbox has even better features.įor example, Rekordbox can make smart playlists. Rekordbox is way better than Traktor when it comes to library management. And some Pioneer controllers actually come with a full Rekordbox license. The full version of Traktor is noticeably more affordable than the full version of Rekordbox, and better yet there’s no upselling to worry about or any hidden charges.īut on the other hand, you can pay monthly for Rekordbox, which is great if you just want to give it a try. And that’s great if you like to switch gear a lot. ![]() Traktor on the other hand works seamlessly with all kinds of controllers, common and obscure ones alike. Sure, Rekordbox works great with the Pioneer brand of controllers, but when you try to use it with other controllers, the platform becomes less stable and harder to work with. Now, we’re going to compare Rekordbox and Traktor. Streamlined like Rekordbox, or detail-packed like Serato. If you still find yourself torn between the two, however, then perhaps you should consider what type of interface you like the best. I would recommend Serato for using a Digital Vinyl System, but recommend Rekordbox for CDJ mixing. But I would argue that the best platform for you depends very much on what hardware you’re using. Conclusionīoth of these platforms have a lot to offer. Serato expansions can vary in price, but within a narrower price range than Rekordbox. Or alternatively, you can buy Serato Intro and the upgrade for roughly the same sort of price as Rekordbox DJ. Serato DJ comes free with certain expensive controllers. You can expect to pick up cheaper ones for about $10, while others cost more than Rekordbox DJ itself. Rekordbox expansion packs can vary in price, however. While Rekordbox software is free to use, if you want to invest in Rekordbox DJ you can expect to pay between $100 and $150. And while Rekordbox is built on the Pioneer framework which was never known for great stability, this has really improved and can be considered reliable.Īlthough Serato is a little better than Rekordbox on that front. We’re pleased to report that both platforms are sufficiently stable. I have to say that it takes a lot more getting used to than what Rekordbox does. Serato’s interface on the other hand is packed with information, with lots of features to explore. Rekordbox looks super professional, really sleek, and minimalist in appearance. It’s great for mixing on Pioneer CDJs but that’s about it. Serato integrates with a whopping 53 controllers, 16 mixers, and four different interfaces.īut Rekordbox isn’t anywhere near as flexible. Rekordbox isn’t compatible with as many controllers as Serato is. While with Rekordbox, you also get a pitch and time function to help with transitioning between tracks. Serato Flip lets you remake your tracks quickly, Serato FX gives you FX customization and helps you to switch pitches. But you can unlock many more features by investing in the expansion packs offered by both platforms… Both have FX tools and edit and remixing tools. Features Of Eachīoth platforms have nice built-in features. They’re also stable, and they get regular software updates from the developers. And they display tracks with waveforms, let you save cue points, and let you tweak FX elements. Is Rekordbox Better Than Serato? Similaritiesīoth platforms are great for organizing your music collection. I’ll be comparing the different features and what they’re like to use. In this article, I directly compare Rekordbox with Serato, and a little later on I’ll also be comparing Rekordbox with Traktor. That’s why I like to put together articles like this one that directly compares different platforms, so you can decide which one best suits your particular needs. But when they are all so reliable and are packed with cool features, it’s hard to pick which one to go with. ![]() |